Well here is another hard hat post I guess. It is a bit longer than usual. If anyone wants to argue in favour, or against, what I have to say feel free, because I feel really strongly about this.

I was really annoyed to find out that a law abiding young mother who brandished a kitchen knife in her own kitchen to scare off intruders found herself being warned about her behaviour by the police. Hertfordshire County Police in the UK.

The young mother was the classically trained musician, former chart star and popular celebrity Myleene Klass, she was at home, alone with her little daughter.

She was in her kitchen and male intruders to her property were in her yard, her daughter was upstairs, she was terrified, banged on the kitchen window and brandished a knife…

The intruders retreated and she called the police.

What happened when Hertfordshire’s “finest” got there?. They warned the potential criminal who had called them about her behaviour using an offensive weapon to threaten the intruders is what!!

Now at this point surely any right thinking person has so got to start to wonder what the point of these useless public employees is.

Did they protect her in any way?. Did their existence put off these intruders in any way?

So we have a situation in the UK where the police seem to be very little actual practical use to the average law abiding citizen and householder, other than to turn up after the event and make a note of the details of any crime or disaster which happened. Maybe arrange for someone to clean up any mess and notify relatives.

When they do bother to turn up they are as likely to prosecute the victim as the perpetrator.

It used to be the British police had a natural store of good will from the law abiding majority of citizens.

Officers mostly tried to provide the sort of policing the majority wanted and expected. They protected the public from criminals. They saw themselves as working for and protecting the average law abiding citizen. Seeing a British bobby in a pointed helmet made you feel a little bit safer.

Not any more… and they mostly look like scary SWAT team members away from the tourist traps these days.

Over the last 20 years things seem to have really changed. These days the police act like they prefer an easy target that boosts their figures, and I guess there are none easier than a generally law abiding member of the public, especially with a huge increase in laws and rules that the normal person can’t keep up with.

The police need to remember they are not some paramilitary occupying force. They are citizens, civil public servants, there to protect society and its honest citizens. Not treat everyone like crooks.

You can’t have a much better example of who the police should be protecting, who they should be working on behalf of, than an innocent young mother and child menaced by trespassers in their own home.

They shouldn’t be bullying her. If the Police feel they need to lean on such a person when they make a mild attempt to scare off intruders then there is something really wrong with how they think and are trained. Also maybe with the sort of person who runs/controls the police.

If what Myleene Klass did is against the law then there is something quite wrong with the law …and those who make and interpret the law, because it should not be!!

If someone trespasses where they clearly should not be and without a lawful excuse then their rights should not be given preference, or even equal rating, over the owner of that property.

If they get injured being where they should not while doing wrong then surely it is their own fault. If they are injured by someone defending themselves their family and their property then again that is just too bad and the law should recognise it.

I really don’t wonder the police are so against the public ever defending themselves, because it must show up what a poor job the police themselves do for the average citizen.

If an intruder is injured or killed, and the force used is fairly reasonable, taking into account what the defender knew, or thought and how physically able they were, then the householder should not be prosecuted.

If you have two physically mature male intruders and one female defender, then even if she shot them with a legally owned firearm then it should be lawful self defence.

The fact is that the average female is physically unlikely to be able to win against two males. Even if she is trained in unarmed combat it is not something a sensible person would want to try.

What option does a woman have under those circumstances? Especially knowing there is only her between her child and a threat, what option but to use any to a weapon to hand to make a believable threat? And if their bluff us called then maybe to use it.

This is always the problem for a woman defending herself. Against physical violence, actual or imminent.

She has to up the ante and do it first, or she loses.

If there is no escape she is left with the choice of “laying back and thinking of England” as it used to be said and hoping if they get what they want they won’t hurt her… and then having to explain why she didn’t try defend herself, or to try to take the guy out with a crippling attack.

I firmly believe a woman should be trained to defend herself, but I am realistic enough to know there are limitations. You try not to get in a bad situation, but sometimes it comes to you. Chances are way high there will be no police there to protect you if it does.

Now it looks like if you realistically try to defend yourself it makes you a criminal.

It is true not just for women, but for anyone who is weaker than or outnumbered by their attackers.

Am I unreasonable to be livid about this? I really don’t think so.